![]() Second, as MS reps are saying if IBM is working with MS Office in Linux, it must be on emulation mode. MS Office) and port it without a license to do so, even if IBM has access to MS Office source code. I think people are making too much out of IBM comments.įirst, i don’t thing any company can grab some other company’s product (e.g. Mfst moving to xml as fileformat might also help with increasing comp., that means if they won’t come through with their patent(s) or if there’s a way around. Some things like “autoforms” are truly missed, though, as well as some easy tasks as pagenumbering are incredibly diffcult with ooo, but all these things will get adressed in 2.0 according to the roadmap. ![]() ![]() was, while not perfect, good enough, means nothing was misformatted in way that important stuff was missing or messed-up. I do, at least with huge and quite complex powerpoint-presentations and some smaller excel-files, and the comp. But I think many people who are screaming that the OO.org import/conversion is good have no real-life experience.” Ibm should therefore at least help improving it parallel to “porting” ms office. No matter how much you like StarOffice/OpenOffice, many companies are tied to Microsoft Office because OO.org Word conversion is not good enough (just try to open a 200 page Word document with images and tables in OO), many Office-specific things are not supported, etc. “For many companies GNU/Linux without Microsoft Office is a no-go.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |